On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 12:47 PM, Linus Torvalds <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 12:38 PM, Pavel Machek <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> But given this is already "regression fix for x86-64 caused regression >> on x86-32", I really believe we should merge trivial fix now, and do >> the cleanups / nicer fixes sometime later? > > The fix patch was already posted, but in another thread (confusingly > with _almost_ the same subject: "Re: Linux 4.15-rc2: Regression in > resume from ACPI S3"). > > Here: > > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/luto/linux.git/commit/?h=x86/fixes > > but it hasn't actually gotten to me yet (I think Luto made a new > version where he split it up into three smaller patches, and I'm > assuming it's in one of the -tip trees heading for me asap). > > All the x86 people have been insanely busy with the crazy page table > isolation patches, that probably is slowing down things. But I was > expecting to get the -tip tree pulls tomorrow (.. because.. Friday. > It's my busiest day of the week because everybody wants to get their > work out before the weekend).
Nah, it's that I was busy with the stupid PTI stuff, and the original version of the patch didn't compile on some configurations. I've tested the version I just sent for suspend-to-ram and suspend-to-disk on 32-bit and 64-bit in a couple of configurations.
