On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 12:41:42PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > X86_BUG_CPU_SECURE_MODE_PTI should be added to DISABLED_FEATURES or
> > DISABLED_BUGS or whatever if it's not configured in, which will reduce
> > bloat. Borislav, that's kind of up your alley, since I don't think
> > the appropriate mask even exists right now.
>
> Will have a look.
Right, I converted X86_BUG_CPU_SECURE_MODE_PTI bug bit to an X86_FEATURE
bit and then the DISABLED_FEATURES thing should just work.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
