On Tue, 19 Dec 2017 16:04:18 +0100 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > The above just seems wrong. local_irq_disable() should imply > > local_bh_disable(), as it doesn't let softirqs run either. > > Where does local_irq_disable() imply this? If it doesn't explicitly do so, it probably should. How can we have a softirq execute when irqs are disabled? -- Steve
