On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 02:45:02PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 20-12-17, 16:43, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > The below makes more sense to me too; hmm?
> > 
> > @@ -335,12 +335,11 @@ static unsigned int sugov_next_freq_shar
> >  
> >             j_max = j_sg_cpu->max;
> >             j_util = sugov_aggregate_util(j_sg_cpu);
> > +           sugov_iowait_boost(j_sg_cpu, &util, &max);

This should 'obviously' have been:

                sugov_iowait_boost(j_sg_cpu, &j_util, *j_max);

> >             if (j_util * max > j_max * util) {
> >                     util = j_util;
> >                     max = j_max;
> >             }
> > -
> > -           sugov_iowait_boost(j_sg_cpu, &util, &max);

Reply via email to