On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 02:45:02PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 20-12-17, 16:43, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > The below makes more sense to me too; hmm? > > > > @@ -335,12 +335,11 @@ static unsigned int sugov_next_freq_shar > > > > j_max = j_sg_cpu->max; > > j_util = sugov_aggregate_util(j_sg_cpu); > > + sugov_iowait_boost(j_sg_cpu, &util, &max);
This should 'obviously' have been: sugov_iowait_boost(j_sg_cpu, &j_util, *j_max); > > if (j_util * max > j_max * util) { > > util = j_util; > > max = j_max; > > } > > - > > - sugov_iowait_boost(j_sg_cpu, &util, &max);