4.14-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Andy Lutomirski <[email protected]>

commit 6e60e583426c2f8751c22c2dfe5c207083b4483a upstream.

We currently special-case stack overflow on the task stack.  We're
going to start putting special stacks in the fixmap with a custom
layout, so they'll have guard pages, too.  Teach the unwinder to be
able to unwind an overflow of any of the stacks.

Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]>
Cc: Boris Ostrovsky <[email protected]>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]>
Cc: Brian Gerst <[email protected]>
Cc: Dave Hansen <[email protected]>
Cc: Dave Hansen <[email protected]>
Cc: David Laight <[email protected]>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <[email protected]>
Cc: Eduardo Valentin <[email protected]>
Cc: Greg KH <[email protected]>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <[email protected]>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <[email protected]>
Cc: Juergen Gross <[email protected]>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: Rik van Riel <[email protected]>
Cc: Will Deacon <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>

---
 arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c |   24 ++++++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c
@@ -112,24 +112,28 @@ void show_trace_log_lvl(struct task_stru
         * - task stack
         * - interrupt stack
         * - HW exception stacks (double fault, nmi, debug, mce)
+        * - SYSENTER stack
         *
-        * x86-32 can have up to three stacks:
+        * x86-32 can have up to four stacks:
         * - task stack
         * - softirq stack
         * - hardirq stack
+        * - SYSENTER stack
         */
        for (regs = NULL; stack; stack = PTR_ALIGN(stack_info.next_sp, 
sizeof(long))) {
                const char *stack_name;
 
-               /*
-                * If we overflowed the task stack into a guard page, jump back
-                * to the bottom of the usable stack.
-                */
-               if (task_stack_page(task) - (void *)stack < PAGE_SIZE)
-                       stack = task_stack_page(task);
-
-               if (get_stack_info(stack, task, &stack_info, &visit_mask))
-                       break;
+               if (get_stack_info(stack, task, &stack_info, &visit_mask)) {
+                       /*
+                        * We weren't on a valid stack.  It's possible that
+                        * we overflowed a valid stack into a guard page.
+                        * See if the next page up is valid so that we can
+                        * generate some kind of backtrace if this happens.
+                        */
+                       stack = (unsigned long *)PAGE_ALIGN((unsigned 
long)stack);
+                       if (get_stack_info(stack, task, &stack_info, 
&visit_mask))
+                               break;
+               }
 
                stack_name = stack_type_name(stack_info.type);
                if (stack_name)


Reply via email to