On Sat, 23 Dec 2017 17:58:46 +0100 Heiko Stuebner <[email protected]> wrote:
> Am Samstag, 23. Dezember 2017, 17:53:45 CET schrieb Emmanuel Vadot: > > On Sat, 23 Dec 2017 17:15:06 +0100 > > Heiko Stuebner <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Hi Emmanuel, > > > > > > Am Samstag, 23. Dezember 2017, 16:22:54 CET schrieb Emmanuel Vadot: > > > > Since those files are also needed kernel side, switch their licences > > > > to GPL/X11 so it can be used in BSD kernels. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Vadot <[email protected]> > > > > > > definitly no objection from me (especially as the file only contains > > > constant definitions, so copyrightability might be debateable), > > > but could you: > > > > > > (1) Adapt all rockchip clock headers in one patch, so we don't do this > > > for each header invididually > > > (2) Do the same for the power/rk3* headers, but in a separate patch > > > as this goes through a different tree > > > > Sure I can do that, will it be better to wait to have some kind of ack > > from someone from rockchip ? > > I don't know if China is somehow affected by the xmas season, but from what > I see, right now you only included Elaine ([email protected]) > but for example not the relevant list ([email protected]). I've just git send using the output of get_maintainer.pl > But we also have some other points to clarify in the other subthread > started by Philippe, so it might be best to get the points he made sorted > before as well. > > > Heiko -- Emmanuel Vadot <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
