On Thu, 21 Dec 2017 19:31:37 +0100
Stefan Brüns <[email protected]> wrote:

> As the timestamp is no longer (ab-)used to measure the function run time,
> it can be taken at the correct time, i.e. when the conversion has finished.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Brüns <[email protected]>
Applied.

Thanks,

Jonathan

> ---
> 
> Changes in v2: None
> 
>  drivers/iio/adc/ina2xx-adc.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/ina2xx-adc.c b/drivers/iio/adc/ina2xx-adc.c
> index 415e53b5c0a6..b7407ac91b59 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/ina2xx-adc.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/ina2xx-adc.c
> @@ -706,8 +706,6 @@ static int ina2xx_work_buffer(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
>       s64 time;
>       unsigned int alert;
>  
> -     time = iio_get_time_ns(indio_dev);
> -
>       /*
>        * Because the timer thread and the chip conversion clock
>        * are asynchronous, the period difference will eventually
> @@ -736,6 +734,8 @@ static int ina2xx_work_buffer(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
>  
>               } while (!alert);
>  
> +     time = iio_get_time_ns(indio_dev);
> +
>       /*
>        * Single register reads: bulk_read will not work with ina226/219
>        * as there is no auto-increment of the register pointer.

Reply via email to