From: Colin Ian King <[email protected]> The functions smbd_recv_buf and smbd_recv_page are local to the source and do not need to be in global scope, so make them static.
Cleans up sparse warnings: symbol 'smbd_recv_buf' was not declared. Should it be static? symbol 'smbd_recv_page' was not declared. Should it be static? Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <[email protected]> --- fs/cifs/smbdirect.c | 7 ++++--- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/cifs/smbdirect.c b/fs/cifs/smbdirect.c index 731577d4317f..0d0545ef735f 100644 --- a/fs/cifs/smbdirect.c +++ b/fs/cifs/smbdirect.c @@ -1855,7 +1855,8 @@ struct smbd_connection *smbd_get_connection( * consumed. But this will require more changes to upper layer code, and also * need to consider packet boundaries while they still being reassembled. */ -int smbd_recv_buf(struct smbd_connection *info, char *buf, unsigned int size) +static int smbd_recv_buf(struct smbd_connection *info, char *buf, + unsigned int size) { struct smbd_response *response; struct smbd_data_transfer *data_transfer; @@ -1995,8 +1996,8 @@ int smbd_recv_buf(struct smbd_connection *info, char *buf, unsigned int size) * to_read: the length of data to read * return value: actual data read */ -int smbd_recv_page(struct smbd_connection *info, - struct page *page, unsigned int to_read) +static int smbd_recv_page(struct smbd_connection *info, + struct page *page, unsigned int to_read) { int ret; char *to_address; -- 2.14.1
