On 01/06, David Lechner wrote: > clk_round_rate() 'answers the question "if I were to pass @rate to > clk_set_rate(), what clock rate would I end up with?" without changing > the hardware'. > > Currently, clk_divider_round_rate() returns the "current value" when > divider->flags & CLK_DIVIDER_READ_ONLY. But, if CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is > set, then clk_set_rate() is supposed to propagate the rate change to the > parent clock. So, we need to do check for CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT and if it > is set, ask the parent clock what rate it can provide given the current > divider value. > > Signed-off-by: David Lechner <[email protected]>
Jerome sent a patch the day before that probably addresses the same thing. See the message-id of [email protected] for more info. -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
