On Thu, May 17, 2007 at 12:39:47AM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > Actually, in my limited experience, SAS is marginally less crappy than SATA, > and has a higher MTBF, probably because the manufacturers try to cut less > corners. But if one can get high-quality SATA drives (where?!), I don't > know why SAS would be superior to SATA.
SAS is dual ported so you can have redundant cables and controllers. -- Len Sorensen - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
