On Thu, 18 Jan 2018 15:08:01 +0100
Boris Brezillon <boris.brezil...@free-electrons.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Jan 2018 14:05:05 +0000
> Wei Yongjun <weiyongj...@huawei.com> wrote:
>
> > Fix to return error code -ENOMEM from the kmem_cache_alloc() error
> > handling case instead of 0, as done elsewhere in this function.
>
> I guess you've used a static analysis code to detect this problem, can
> you name it in the commit message, and paste the error/warning message
> it reported next time you submit this kind of patch.
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <weiyongj...@huawei.com>
>
> NAck. I you read the code you'll see that err is initialized to -ENOMEM
> here [1], so these changes are actually not needed.
Sorry, just realized I was wrong. It seems that err can be overridden by
[2]. So this patch is indeed fixing a real problem.
Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezil...@free-electrons.com>
>
> > ---
> > drivers/mtd/ubi/wl.c | 8 ++++++--
> > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/ubi/wl.c b/drivers/mtd/ubi/wl.c
> > index 77ab49f..2052a64 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mtd/ubi/wl.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mtd/ubi/wl.c
> > @@ -1617,8 +1617,10 @@ int ubi_wl_init(struct ubi_device *ubi, struct
> > ubi_attach_info *ai)
> > cond_resched();
> >
> > e = kmem_cache_alloc(ubi_wl_entry_slab, GFP_KERNEL);
> > - if (!e)
> > + if (!e) {
> > + err = -ENOMEM;
> > goto out_free;
> > + }
> >
> > e->pnum = aeb->pnum;
> > e->ec = aeb->ec;
> > @@ -1637,8 +1639,10 @@ int ubi_wl_init(struct ubi_device *ubi, struct
> > ubi_attach_info *ai)
> > cond_resched();
> >
> > e = kmem_cache_alloc(ubi_wl_entry_slab, GFP_KERNEL);
> > - if (!e)
> > + if (!e) {
> > + err = -ENOMEM;
> > goto out_free;
> > + }
> >
> > e->pnum = aeb->pnum;
> > e->ec = aeb->ec;
> >
>
> [1]https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/tree/drivers/mtd/ubi/wl.c?h=next-20180118#n1596
[2]https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/tree/drivers/mtd/ubi/wl.c?h=next-20180118#n1609
