On Thu, 18 Jan 2018 12:06:10 +0000 "Woodhouse, David" <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2018-01-18 at 21:01 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote: > > > > +#define X86_INDIRECT_THUNK(reg) \ > > + *(.text.__x86.indirect_thunk.##reg) > > Note that we don't actually care about those being in their own > section, named after the register. That was just a hangover from the > initial GCC COMDAT implementation. > > If it makes your life easier just to put them all in a single section, > go ahead. Got it. I just concerned that gcc was using this section. I'll make it ".text.__x86.indirect_thunk" to consolidate. Thanks! -- Masami Hiramatsu <[email protected]>
