On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 09:55:01AM +0000, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote: > >>@@ -1180,13 +1180,14 @@ static int bam_dma_probe(struct platform_device > >>*pdev) > >> "qcom,controlled-remotely"); > >> bdev->bamclk = devm_clk_get(bdev->dev, "bam_clk"); > > > >but you still do clk_get unconditionally? > > Only reason to do this way is to not break existing users in the mainline. > > remotely controlled BAM is already supported in upstream driver, there are > users of this who pass clk from device tree, If I make this conditional then > subsequent reads to the BAM registers for those instances might crash the > system.
But these instances are remote controlled, so if we stop representing them in Linux, why would we read them? -- ~Vinod
