> So it works, but you are complaining anyway? How serious do you interpret such information in the SmPL manual?
>> https://github.com/coccinelle/coccinelle/blob/bf1c6a5869dd324f5faeeaa3a12d57270e478b21/docs/manual/cocci_syntax.tex#L50 >> >> “… >> Furthermore, @ should not be used in this code. … >> …” > > I guess the conclusion is that it woks in strings (which are pretty > universal) and not in comments (which are language specific). Would you like to achieve any safer data processing for potentially “reserved” characters? Regards, Markus
