4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------ From: Russell King <[email protected]> commit e9062481824384f00299971f923fecf6b3668001 upstream. Avoid the 'bx' instruction on CPUs that have no support for Thumb and thus do not implement this instruction by moving the generation of this opcode to a separate function that selects between: bx reg and mov pc, reg according to the capabilities of the CPU. Fixes: 39c13c204bb1 ("arm: eBPF JIT compiler") Signed-off-by: Russell King <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]> --- arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c | 18 +++++++++++------- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) --- a/arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c +++ b/arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c @@ -285,16 +285,20 @@ static inline void emit_mov_i(const u8 r emit_mov_i_no8m(rd, val, ctx); } -static inline void emit_blx_r(u8 tgt_reg, struct jit_ctx *ctx) +static void emit_bx_r(u8 tgt_reg, struct jit_ctx *ctx) { - ctx->seen |= SEEN_CALL; -#if __LINUX_ARM_ARCH__ < 5 - emit(ARM_MOV_R(ARM_LR, ARM_PC), ctx); - if (elf_hwcap & HWCAP_THUMB) emit(ARM_BX(tgt_reg), ctx); else emit(ARM_MOV_R(ARM_PC, tgt_reg), ctx); +} + +static inline void emit_blx_r(u8 tgt_reg, struct jit_ctx *ctx) +{ + ctx->seen |= SEEN_CALL; +#if __LINUX_ARM_ARCH__ < 5 + emit(ARM_MOV_R(ARM_LR, ARM_PC), ctx); + emit_bx_r(tgt_reg, ctx); #else emit(ARM_BLX_R(tgt_reg), ctx); #endif @@ -997,7 +1001,7 @@ static int emit_bpf_tail_call(struct jit emit_a32_mov_i(tmp2[1], off, false, ctx); emit(ARM_LDR_R(tmp[1], tmp[1], tmp2[1]), ctx); emit(ARM_ADD_I(tmp[1], tmp[1], ctx->prologue_bytes), ctx); - emit(ARM_BX(tmp[1]), ctx); + emit_bx_r(tmp[1], ctx); /* out: */ if (out_offset == -1) @@ -1166,7 +1170,7 @@ static void build_epilogue(struct jit_ct emit(ARM_POP(reg_set), ctx); /* Return back to the callee function */ if (!(ctx->seen & SEEN_CALL)) - emit(ARM_BX(ARM_LR), ctx); + emit_bx_r(ARM_LR, ctx); #endif }
