> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chris Chiu [mailto:c...@endlessm.com]
> Sent: Friday, February 2, 2018 10:03 AM
> To: Hau <h...@realtek.com>
> Cc: nic_swsd <nic_s...@realtek.com>; net...@vger.kernel.org; Linux
> Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>; Linux Upstreaming Team
> <li...@endlessm.com>
> Subject: Re: r8169 take too long to complete driver initialization
> 
> On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 8:07 PM, Chris Chiu <c...@endlessm.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 11:24 PM, Hau <h...@realtek.com> wrote:
> >> Hi Chris,
> >>
> >> Could you test following patch?
> >>
> >>  DECLARE_RTL_COND(rtl_ocp_tx_cond)
> >>  {
> >>         void __iomem *ioaddr = tp->mmio_addr;
> >>
> >> -       return RTL_R8(IBISR0) & 0x02;
> >> +       return RTL_R8(IBISR0) & 0x20;
> >>  }
> >>
> >>  static void rtl8168ep_stop_cmac(struct rtl8169_private *tp)  {
> >>         void __iomem *ioaddr = tp->mmio_addr;
> >>
> >>         RTL_W8(IBCR2, RTL_R8(IBCR2) & ~0x01);
> >> -       rtl_msleep_loop_wait_low(tp, &rtl_ocp_tx_cond, 50, 2000);
> >> +       rtl_msleep_loop_wait_high(tp, &rtl_ocp_tx_cond, 50, 2000);
> >>         RTL_W8(IBISR0, RTL_R8(IBISR0) | 0x20);
> >>         RTL_W8(IBCR0, RTL_R8(IBCR0) & ~0x01);  }
> >>
> >> Thanks.
> >>
> >
> > Yes. It completes the initialization in 70 ms. So it means the
> > rtl_ocp_tx_cond are waiting for incorrect register bit? Can you help work
> out a patch for this?
> >
> > Chris
> >
> >
> 
> Gentle ping,
> cheers.
> 
> Chris
> 

I have submitted the patch to kernel team.
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/net.git/commit/?id=086ca23d03c0d2f4088f472386778d293e15c5f6


------Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.

> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: Chris Chiu [mailto:c...@endlessm.com]
> >>> Sent: Monday, January 29, 2018 6:12 PM
> >>> To: nic_swsd <nic_s...@realtek.com>; net...@vger.kernel.org; Linux
> >>> Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>; Linux Upstreaming Team
> >>> <li...@endlessm.com>
> >>> Subject: Re: r8169 take too long to complete driver initialization
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 10:17 AM, Chris Chiu <c...@endlessm.com> wrote:
> >>> > On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 4:41 PM, Chris Chiu <c...@endlessm.com>
> wrote:
> >>> >> Hi,
> >>> >>     We've hit a suspend/resume issue on a Acer desktop caused by
> >>> >> r8169 driver. The dmseg
> >>> >>
> https://gist.github.com/mschiu77/b741849b5070281daaead8dfee312d1a
> >>> >> shows it's still in msleep() within a mutex lock.
> >>> >>     After looking into the code, it's caused by the
> >>> >> rtl8168ep_stop_cmac() which is waiting 100 seconds for
> >>> >> rtl_ocp_tx_cond. The following dmesg states that the r8169 driver
> >>> >> is loaded.
> >>> >>
> >>> >> [   20.270526] r8169 Gigabit Ethernet driver 2.3LK-NAPI loaded
> >>> >>
> >>> >> But it takes > 100 seconds to get the following messages
> >>> >>
> >>> >> [  140.400223] r8169 0000:02:00.0 (unnamed net_device)
> >>> >> (uninitialized): rtl_ocp_tx_cond == 1 (loop: 2000, delay: 50).
> >>> >> [  140.413294] r8169 0000:02:00.0 eth0: RTL8168ep/8111ep at
> >>> >> 0xffffb16c80db1000, f8:0f:41:ea:74:0d, XID 10200800 IRQ 46 [
> >>> >> 140.413297] r8169 0000:02:00.0 eth0: jumbo features [frames: 9200
> >>> >> bytes, tx checksumming: ko]
> >>> >>
> >>> >> So any trial to suspend the machine during this period would
> >>> >> always get device/resource busy message then abort. Is this
> >>> >> rtl_ocp_tx_cond necessary? Because the ethernet is still working
> >>> >> and I don't see any problem. I don't know it should be considered
> >>> >> normal or not. Please let me know if any more information
> >>> >> required. Thanks
> >>> >>
> >>> >> Chris
> >>> >
> >>> > gentle ping,
> >>> >
> >>> > cheers.
> >>>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>     Just found a r8168 driver which seems to be authrized by realtek
> >>> for cross comparison. I tried applying the patch to latest 4.15
> >>> kernel and the driver done it's initialization in faily short time. The 
> >>> patch
> file is here
> >>>     https://gist.github.com/mschiu77/fcf406e64a1a437f46cf2be643f1057d.
> >>>
> >>>     In mainline r8169.c, the IBISR0 register need to be polled in
> >>> the rtl8168ep_stop_cmac().
> >>> In the patch file, there's also the same IBISR0 polling code in
> >>> Dash2DisableTx(), but it's been bypassed since the chipset maches
> >>> HW_DASH_SUPPORT_TYPE_2.
> >>> Per the rtl_chip_info[] in r8168_n.c, CFG_METHOD_23/27/28 are
> >>> HW_DASH_SUPPORT_TYPE_2, and they happens to be the only 3 named
> >>> RTL8168EP/8111EP in the rtl_chip_info[].
> >>>
> >>>     To find the same matches in r8169.c, RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_49/50/51
> >>> seems share the same config. Can anyone clarify if the
> >>> rtl_ocp_tx_cond() really necessary for 8168EP/8111EP?
> >>> Or we can just ignore the condition check for
> RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_49/50/51?
> >>>
> >>> Chris
> >>>
> >>> ------Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.

Reply via email to