Em Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 01:26:27PM -0800, kan.li...@intel.com escreveu:
> From: Kan Liang <kan.li...@intel.com>
>
> perf top need it to handle overwrite fallback later.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.li...@intel.com>
> ---
> tools/perf/util/evsel.c | 5 +++++
> tools/perf/util/evsel.h | 2 ++
> 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/evsel.c b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
> index 4eea3b4..1dd3700 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
> @@ -1670,6 +1670,11 @@ static bool ignore_missing_thread(struct perf_evsel
> *evsel,
> return true;
> }
>
> +bool is_write_backward_fail(void)
> +{
> + return perf_missing_features.write_backward;
> +}
> +
Humm, I think we better expose perf_missing_features, i.e. tools using
if (perf_missing_features.write_backward)
looks more clear than:
if (is_write_backward_fail())
This is minor, so I'm doing this myself, please holler if you disagree.
- Arnaldo
> int perf_evsel__open(struct perf_evsel *evsel, struct cpu_map *cpus,
> struct thread_map *threads)
> {
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/evsel.h b/tools/perf/util/evsel.h
> index 846e416..1f46728 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/evsel.h
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/evsel.h
> @@ -448,4 +448,6 @@ int perf_event_attr__fprintf(FILE *fp, struct
> perf_event_attr *attr,
>
> struct perf_env *perf_evsel__env(struct perf_evsel *evsel);
>
> +bool is_write_backward_fail(void);
> +
> #endif /* __PERF_EVSEL_H */
> --
> 2.5.5
