I'm seeing build failures from the two newly introduced arrays that are marked 'const' and '__initdata', which are mutually exclusive:
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c:882:43: error: 'cpu_no_speculation' causes a section type conflict with 'e820_table_firmware_init' arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c:895:43: error: 'cpu_no_meltdown' causes a section type conflict with 'e820_table_firmware_init' The correct annotation is __initconst. Fixes: fec9434a12f3 ("x86/pti: Do not enable PTI on CPUs which are not vulnerable to Meltdown") Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de> --- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c index c7c996a692fd..4c3887a09822 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c @@ -879,7 +879,7 @@ static void identify_cpu_without_cpuid(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c) #endif } -static const __initdata struct x86_cpu_id cpu_no_speculation[] = { +static const __initconst struct x86_cpu_id cpu_no_speculation[] = { { X86_VENDOR_INTEL, 6, INTEL_FAM6_ATOM_CEDARVIEW, X86_FEATURE_ANY }, { X86_VENDOR_INTEL, 6, INTEL_FAM6_ATOM_CLOVERVIEW, X86_FEATURE_ANY }, { X86_VENDOR_INTEL, 6, INTEL_FAM6_ATOM_LINCROFT, X86_FEATURE_ANY }, @@ -892,7 +892,7 @@ static const __initdata struct x86_cpu_id cpu_no_speculation[] = { {} }; -static const __initdata struct x86_cpu_id cpu_no_meltdown[] = { +static const __initconst struct x86_cpu_id cpu_no_meltdown[] = { { X86_VENDOR_AMD }, {} }; -- 2.9.0