On Sat, Feb 3, 2018 at 1:11 AM, Mark Brown <broo...@kernel.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 02, 2018 at 09:33:18PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 6:20 PM, Daniel Baluta <daniel.bal...@nxp.com> wrote:
>
>> > +static int ak5558_set_dai_mute(struct snd_soc_dai *dai, int mute)
>> > +{
>> > +       struct snd_soc_codec *codec = dai->codec;
>> > +       struct ak5558_priv *ak5558 = snd_soc_codec_get_drvdata(codec);
>>
>> > +       int ndt = 0;
>>
>> It might be even
>>
>>       int ndt = max(ak5558->fs ? 583000 / ak5558->fs : 5, 5);
>
> Please don't encourage people to use the ternery operator like that, it
> does nothing for legibility not to write out the conditionals.

Noted.

>> > +static const struct i2c_device_id ak5558_i2c_id[] = {
>> > +       { "ak5558", 0 },
>> > +       { }
>> > +};
>> > +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, ak5558_i2c_id);
>
>> I dunno if it's really helpful to have. Though it's up to Mark and you.
>
> I don't care either way.

Since Mark is okay with either, I would rather switch to ->probe_new()
and remove above table.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko

Reply via email to