4.15-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------ From: Arnd Bergmann [email protected] commit 4bf5d56d429cbc96c23d809a08f63cd29e1a702e I'm seeing build failures from the two newly introduced arrays that are marked 'const' and '__initdata', which are mutually exclusive: arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c:882:43: error: 'cpu_no_speculation' causes a section type conflict with 'e820_table_firmware_init' arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c:895:43: error: 'cpu_no_meltdown' causes a section type conflict with 'e820_table_firmware_init' The correct annotation is __initconst. Fixes: fec9434a12f3 ("x86/pti: Do not enable PTI on CPUs which are not vulnerable to Meltdown") Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Cc: Ricardo Neri <[email protected]> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <[email protected]> Cc: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]> Cc: Thomas Garnier <[email protected]> Cc: David Woodhouse <[email protected]> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]> --- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c @@ -900,7 +900,7 @@ static void identify_cpu_without_cpuid(s #endif } -static const __initdata struct x86_cpu_id cpu_no_speculation[] = { +static const __initconst struct x86_cpu_id cpu_no_speculation[] = { { X86_VENDOR_INTEL, 6, INTEL_FAM6_ATOM_CEDARVIEW, X86_FEATURE_ANY }, { X86_VENDOR_INTEL, 6, INTEL_FAM6_ATOM_CLOVERVIEW, X86_FEATURE_ANY }, { X86_VENDOR_INTEL, 6, INTEL_FAM6_ATOM_LINCROFT, X86_FEATURE_ANY }, @@ -913,7 +913,7 @@ static const __initdata struct x86_cpu_i {} }; -static const __initdata struct x86_cpu_id cpu_no_meltdown[] = { +static const __initconst struct x86_cpu_id cpu_no_meltdown[] = { { X86_VENDOR_AMD }, {} };
