Hi Laura,
On 2018/2/7 7:11, Laura Abbott wrote:
> On 02/06/2018 03:10 PM, Laura Abbott wrote:
>> On 02/04/2018 07:26 PM, Yisheng Xie wrote:
>>> ion_page_pool_add will always return 0, however ion_page_pool_free will
>>> call ion_page_pool_free_pages when ion_page_pool_add's return value is
>>> not 0, so it is a dead code which can be removed.
>>>
>>
>> Can you clean up ion_page_pool_add to be a void return as well?
>> No sense in having it just always return 0.
>>
>
> Nevermind, just saw the follow up patch. Both of them:
>
> Acked-by: Laura Abbott <labb...@redhat.com>
Thanks.
If you do not mind, I will send out another two cleanup patchs:
cleanup ion_page_pool_alloc_pages() and combine cache/uncache pools into one
pools.
Thanks
>
>>> Signed-off-by: Yisheng Xie <xieyishe...@huawei.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/staging/android/ion/ion_page_pool.c | 6 +-----
>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/android/ion/ion_page_pool.c
>>> b/drivers/staging/android/ion/ion_page_pool.c
>>> index 4452e28..150626f 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/staging/android/ion/ion_page_pool.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/staging/android/ion/ion_page_pool.c
>>> @@ -79,13 +79,9 @@ struct page *ion_page_pool_alloc(struct ion_page_pool
>>> *pool)
>>> void ion_page_pool_free(struct ion_page_pool *pool, struct page *page)
>>> {
>>> - int ret;
>>> -
>>> BUG_ON(pool->order != compound_order(page));
>>> - ret = ion_page_pool_add(pool, page);
>>> - if (ret)
>>> - ion_page_pool_free_pages(pool, page);
>>> + ion_page_pool_add(pool, page);
>>> }
>>> static int ion_page_pool_total(struct ion_page_pool *pool, bool high)
>>>
>>
>
>
>
