On Wed, 2018-02-07 at 09:03 +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 06-02-18, 17:52, sean.w...@mediatek.com wrote:
> > cpus {
> > #address-cells = <2>;
> > #size-cells = <0>;
> > @@ -26,6 +70,10 @@
> > device_type = "cpu";
> > compatible = "arm,cortex-a53", "arm,armv8";
> > reg = <0x0 0x0>;
> > + clocks = <&infracfg CLK_INFRA_MUX1_SEL>,
> > + <&apmixedsys CLK_APMIXED_MAIN_CORE_EN>;
> > + clock-names = "cpu", "intermediate";
> > + operating-points-v2 = <&cpu_opp_table>;
> > enable-method = "psci";
> > clock-frequency = <1300000000>;
> > };
> > @@ -34,6 +82,7 @@
> > device_type = "cpu";
> > compatible = "arm,cortex-a53", "arm,armv8";
> > reg = <0x0 0x1>;
> > + operating-points-v2 = <&cpu_opp_table>;
> > enable-method = "psci";
> > clock-frequency = <1300000000>;
> > };
>
> Sorry for not picking this earlier, but you should probably add the same clock
> related properties for both cpu nodes here. Things will break if CPU1 is used
> by
> the cpufreq core to bring the cpufreq policy online.
>
> This can happen if cpufreq driver is a module, CPU0 is hotplugged out and then
> the cpufreq driver is inserted.
>
mt7622 cpu0 does not support hotplug. do I still need to add same clock
related properties for both cpu nodes here?
