On 02/07/18 at 01:48pm, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> ebied...@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) writes:
> > Now that I see that I agree in essence with this patch series.
> > I don't agree with the implemenation details.
> > Can you please split disable_IO_APIC and switch_to_legacy_irq_mode
> > in a single patch.
> Now that I think about it can you call the function not
> switch_to_legacy_irq_mode but restore_boot_irq_mode. And the
> corresponding x86_io_apic_ops not .disable but .restore.
> That should make the purpose of the code clearer, and help avoid
> mistakes like the one that led to this regression.
Thanks for your comments and great suggestion. Have made change as you
suggested, will post after test passed.