On 09-02-18, 09:02, Claudio Scordino wrote: > If I'm not wrong, at the hardware level we do have a physical rate limit (as > we cannot trigger a frequency update when there is one already on-going). > Don't know if this could somehow mitigate such effect.
Yeah, so in the worst case we will start a new freq-change right after the previous one has finished. -- viresh
