On 09-02-18, 09:02, Claudio Scordino wrote:
> If I'm not wrong, at the hardware level we do have a physical rate limit (as 
> we cannot trigger a frequency update when there is one already on-going).
> Don't know if this could somehow mitigate such effect.

Yeah, so in the worst case we will start a new freq-change right after
the previous one has finished.

-- 
viresh

Reply via email to