----- On Feb 9, 2018, at 1:25 PM, Will Deacon will.dea...@arm.com wrote: > On Thu, Feb 08, 2018 at 07:04:56PM +0000, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: >> ----- On Feb 8, 2018, at 1:56 PM, Will Deacon will.dea...@arm.com wrote: >> >> > On Thu, Feb 08, 2018 at 08:03:50AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: >> >> >> >> * Will Deacon <will.dea...@arm.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> > For the sake of avoiding the conflict, can we just drop it for now, >> >> > please? >> >> >> >> Yeah, so I resolved the conflict by merging the (already upstream) bits >> >> and >> >> Linus >> >> pulled that resolution. From now on the level of comments you want there >> >> is up >> >> to >> >> you! :-) >> > >> > Haha, ok! Mathieu -- are you still planning to add something under >> > Documentation/? Regardless of my preference on comments, I think it would >> > be useful. >> >> I submitted it as RFC a few days ago, and I'm still awaiting feedback: >> >> http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1517936413-19675-1-git-send-email-mathieu.desnoy...@efficios.com >> >> If you guys are OK with the approach, I can submit it again, this time >> without >> the RFC >> tag. > > Yes, please!
Done: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1518208256-22034-1-git-send-email-mathieu.desnoy...@efficios.com Let's see what Thomas/Ingo/PeterZ have to say about this approach to documentation. Ingo, if you are OK with it, this feature documentation patch could go through the scheduler tree. Thanks, Mathieu -- Mathieu Desnoyers EfficiOS Inc. http://www.efficios.com