> On 10 Feb 2018, at 1:04 AM, Marc Zyngier <marc.zyng...@arm.com> wrote:
>
> On 09/02/18 15:54, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>> On February 9, 2018 12:51:33 AM PST, Marc Zyngier <marc.zyng...@arm.com>
>> wrote:
>>> On 09/02/18 02:10, Jaedon Shin wrote:
>>>> Since commit ad67b74d2469 ("printk: hash addresses printed with %p")
>>>> pointers printed with %p are hashed. Use %px instead of %p to print
>>>> pointer value.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Jaedon Shin <jaedon.s...@gmail.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/irqchip/irq-bcm7038-l1.c | 2 +-
>>>> drivers/irqchip/irq-bcm7120-l2.c | 2 +-
>>>> drivers/irqchip/irq-brcmstb-l2.c | 2 +-
>>>> 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-bcm7038-l1.c
>>> b/drivers/irqchip/irq-bcm7038-l1.c
>>>> index 55cfb986225b..f604c1d89b3b 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-bcm7038-l1.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-bcm7038-l1.c
>>>> @@ -339,7 +339,7 @@ int __init bcm7038_l1_of_init(struct device_node
>>> *dn,
>>>> goto out_unmap;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> - pr_info("registered BCM7038 L1 intc (mem: 0x%p, IRQs: %d)\n",
>>>> + pr_info("registered BCM7038 L1 intc (mem: 0x%px, IRQs: %d)\n",
>>>> intc->cpus[0]->map_base, IRQS_PER_WORD * intc->n_words);
>>>>
>>>> return 0;
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-bcm7120-l2.c
>>> b/drivers/irqchip/irq-bcm7120-l2.c
>>>> index 983640eba418..1cc4dd1d584a 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-bcm7120-l2.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-bcm7120-l2.c
>>>> @@ -318,7 +318,7 @@ static int __init bcm7120_l2_intc_probe(struct
>>> device_node *dn,
>>>> }
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> - pr_info("registered %s intc (mem: 0x%p, parent IRQ(s): %d)\n",
>>>> + pr_info("registered %s intc (mem: 0x%px, parent IRQ(s): %d)\n",
>>>> intc_name, data->map_base[0], data->num_parent_irqs);
>>>>
>>>> return 0;
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-brcmstb-l2.c
>>> b/drivers/irqchip/irq-brcmstb-l2.c
>>>> index 691d20eb0bec..6760edeeb666 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-brcmstb-l2.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-brcmstb-l2.c
>>>> @@ -262,7 +262,7 @@ static int __init brcmstb_l2_intc_of_init(struct
>>> device_node *np,
>>>> ct->chip.irq_set_wake = irq_gc_set_wake;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> - pr_info("registered L2 intc (mem: 0x%p, parent irq: %d)\n",
>>>> + pr_info("registered L2 intc (mem: 0x%px, parent irq: %d)\n",
>>>> base, parent_irq);
>>>>
>>>> return 0;
>>>>
>>>
>>> Why is that something useful to do? This just tells you where the
>>> device
>>> is mapped in the VA space, and I doubt that's a useful information,
>>> hashed pointers or not. Am I missing something obvious?
>>
>> No you are right there is not much value in printing the register
>> virtual address (sometimes there is e.g: on MIPS) either we fix the
>> prints to show the physical address of the base register or we could
>> possibly drop the prints entirely.
>
> Displaying the PA can be useful if you have several identical blocks in
> your system and you want to be able to identify them. Given that there
> is probably only one of these controllers per system, the address is
> pretty pointless.
>
> If you send me a patch removing the prints, I'll queue it.
>
> Thanks,
>
> M.
> --
> Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
I'll submit a new one to drop the entire print.
Thanks,
Jaedon
