On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 11:41 AM, Miguel Ojeda
<miguel.ojeda.sando...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 10:20 AM, Willy Tarreau <w...@1wt.eu> wrote:
>> On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 09:58:44AM +0100, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
>>> On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 12:50 AM, Robert Abel <ra...@robertabel.eu> wrote:

>>> >                         shift ^= 4;
>>> >                         if (*esc >= '0' && *esc <= '9') {
>>> >                                 value |= (*esc - '0') << shift;
>>> > -                       } else if (*esc >= 'A' && *esc <= 'Z') {
>>> > +                       } else if (*esc >= 'A' && *esc <= 'F') {
>>> >                                 value |= (*esc - 'A' + 10) << shift;
>>> > -                       } else if (*esc >= 'a' && *esc <= 'z') {
>>> > +                       } else if (*esc >= 'a' && *esc <= 'f') {
>>>
>>> Willy, Geert: this seems obvious, but do you know if the broader range
>>> was intended for some reason?
>>
>> No, I think it was simply a brain fart from me 14 years ago, as I can
>> find it as well in the original 0.9.0 patch for kernel 2.4!

I understand that we have a huge and hopefully nice library in the
kernel, but the question still the same, what prevents a developer or
maintainer to look at it from time to time?

For, I dare to say, ages we have hex_to_bin() and hex2bin().
Can we use it?

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko

Reply via email to