* Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 12:28:38PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > Separate would be better, it makes sense and is one problem less to worry > > about? > > Something like so then?
Yeah, perfect! > I'm not entirely sure which commit wants to fo in Fixes, I picked the earlier > one, but it could equally have been: > > Fixes: f208820a321f ("Revert "x86/speculation: Simplify > indirect_branch_prediction_barrier()"") I'll leave the tag out (in case a rebase has to be done), as these commits are close enough to each other and are also in a single backporting block of commits. Thanks, Ingo