* Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org> wrote:

> On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 12:28:38PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> > Separate would be better, it makes sense and is one problem less to worry 
> > about?
> 
> Something like so then?

Yeah, perfect!

> I'm not entirely sure which commit wants to fo in Fixes, I picked the earlier 
> one, but it could equally have been:
> 
> Fixes: f208820a321f ("Revert "x86/speculation: Simplify 
> indirect_branch_prediction_barrier()"")

I'll leave the tag out (in case a rebase has to be done), as these commits are 
close enough to each other and are also in a single backporting block of 
commits.

Thanks,

        Ingo

Reply via email to