On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 6:56 AM, Christoph Hellwig <h...@infradead.org> wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 04, 2018 at 12:34:38PM -0500, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
>> For reasons totally beyond my understanding, gcc 8 changed the
>> order of two structure member, which leads to an error:
> I'm a little late on this, but isn't the whole point of C99 initializers
> that field order should not matter at all?

For C99, this is true. The plugins are built differently and follow
C++ conventions, which, for reasons I cannot understand, are ordered.
:( Regardless, the fix actually results in fewer lines of code, so
this is fine.


Kees Cook
Pixel Security

Reply via email to