[]..
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845-mtp.dts
>> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845-mtp.dts
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..617c7bb25fb1
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845-mtp.dts
>> @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>
> It would, of course, be up to Qualcomm. ...but might I suggest instead:
>
> // SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0+ OR MIT)
>
> The device tree files really don't have any special secret sauce in
> them and IIRC allowing them to have a more permissive MIT license _or_
> a GPL allowed people to run other operating systems on these boards.
> This kind of thing is better to fix now so we don't have to go and get
> everyone's permission later on.
sure, sounds reasonable, but I am told I need to get this reviewed once
by qualcomm legal before we go ahead and use the dual licensing copyright.
I will update based on what I hear.
[]..
>
>> +/*
>> + * Copyright (c) 2018, The Linux Foundation. All rights reserved.
>> + */
>
> IMHO add an extra line to this comment with a description to avoid the
> bike shedding of how we're supposed to do 1-line comments in device
> tree files. AKA:
>
> /*
> * SDM845 MTP board device tree source
> *
> * Copyright (c) 2018, The Linux Foundation. All rights reserved.
> */
sure will update.
>
>
>> +
>> +/dts-v1/;
>> +
>> +#include "sdm845.dtsi"
>> +
>> +/ {
>> + model = "Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. SDM845 MTP";
>> + compatible = "qcom,sdm845-mtp";
>
> For me checkpatch complains about this. It looks like the file
> "Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.txt" needs to be updated
> with "sdm845". I don't think that will make checkpatch be quiet
> (since that file doesn't have a full list of every board), but it
> still should be the correct thing to do.
sure, I missed updating it, will fix.
>
>
>> +};
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi
>> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..55a7e0b454e1
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi
>> @@ -0,0 +1,275 @@
>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>
> As per above, suggest dual licensed?
>
>
>> +/*
>> + * Copyright (c) 2018, The Linux Foundation. All rights reserved.
>
> As per above, suggest adding an extra line to avoid the bikeshed.
>
> SDM845 SoC device tree source
>
>
> Besides those things, everything looks good as far as I can see. I'm
> not an expert on every one of the devices used in this file, but
> reading through bindings docs and looking at other users of them, it
> looks sane enough. Thus, with the above nits fixed you can feel free
> to add my Reviewed-by.
Thanks, the only thing I need to wait for before I respin this is to
get a go ahead from legal for the dual licensing copyright header.
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
