On 15/02/18 16:08, Lukas Senger wrote:
@@ -20,18 +21,20 @@
target = <&gpio>;
__overlay__ {
pps_pins: pps_pins@12 {
- brcm,pins = <18>;
- brcm,function = <0>; // in
- brcm,pull = <0>; // off
+ brcm,pins = <18 17>;
+ brcm,function = <0 1>; // in
out
+ brcm,pull = <0 0>; // off
off
These modifications are not PPS related.
};
};
};
__overrides__ {
- gpiopin = <&pps>,"gpios:4",
+ gpiopin = <&pps>,"in-gpios:4",
<&pps>,"reg:0",
<&pps_pins>,"brcm,pins:0",
<&pps_pins>,"reg:0";
+ echopin = <&pps>,"out-gpios:4",
+ <&pps_pins>,"brcm,pins:4";
Ditto.
I don't understand why these modifications are unrelated. Especially
the echopin-option should exist, shouldn't it?
These modifications are needed to define a custom instance of a PPS device which
is not part of the PPS subtree, that's why they should be put into another patch.
Ciao,
Rodolfo
--
HCE Engineering e-mail: giome...@hce-engineering.it
GNU/Linux Solutions giome...@enneenne.com
Linux Device Driver giome...@linux.it
Embedded Systems phone: +39 349 2432127
UNIX programming skype: rodolfo.giometti
Cosino Project - the quick prototyping embedded system - www.cosino.it
Freelance ICT Italia - Consulente ICT Italia - www.consulenti-ict.it
