On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 3:22 PM, Tejun Heo <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 11:39:13AM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: >> On Thu, 2018-02-15 at 22:22 +0100, SF Markus Elfring wrote: >> > From: Markus Elfring <[email protected]> >> > Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2018 22:15:25 +0100 >> > >> > Omit an extra message for a memory allocation failure in this >> > function. >> > >> > This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software. >> >> Tejun, it's up to you. In case you are fine with the change, > > Yeah, these are marginal at best and one may be able to argue that > emitting a message with device identifier is still useful but these > allocations are order-zero and can't fail to begin with, so...
IIRC device core prints a warn with error code and device name if ->probe() fails. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
