On 02/22/2018 06:44 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Thu 22-02-18 18:38:11, Andrey Ryabinin wrote:
>>>> with the patch:
>>>> best: 1.04 secs, 9.7G reclaimed
>>>> worst: 2.2 secs, 16G reclaimed.
>>>> best: 5.4 sec, 35G reclaimed
>>>> worst: 22.2 sec, 136G reclaimed
>>> Could you also compare how much memory do we reclaim with/without the
>> I did and I wrote the results. Please look again.
> I must have forgotten. Care to point me to the message-id?
The results are quoted right above, literally above. Raise your eyes up.
I write it here again:
with the patch:
best: 9.7G reclaimed
worst: 16G reclaimed
best: 35G reclaimed
worst: 136G reclaimed
Or you asking about something else? If so, I don't understand what you want.
> 20180119132544.19569-2-aryabi...@virtuozzo.com doesn't contain this
> information and a quick glance over the follow up thread doesn't have
> anything as well. Ideally, this should be in the patch changelog, btw.
Well, I did these measurements only today and I don't have time machine.