On 02/22/2018 06:44 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Thu 22-02-18 18:38:11, Andrey Ryabinin wrote:

>>>> with the patch:
>>>> best: 1.04  secs, 9.7G reclaimed
>>>> worst: 2.2 secs, 16G reclaimed.
>>>> without:
>>>> best: 5.4 sec, 35G reclaimed
>>>> worst: 22.2 sec, 136G reclaimed
>>> Could you also compare how much memory do we reclaim with/without the
>>> patch?
>> I did and I wrote the results. Please look again.
> I must have forgotten. Care to point me to the message-id?

The results are quoted right above, literally above. Raise your eyes up. 
message-id 0927bcab-7e2c-c6f9-d16a-315ac436b...@virtuozzo.com

I write it here again:

with the patch:
 best: 9.7G reclaimed
 worst: 16G reclaimed

 best: 35G reclaimed
 worst: 136G reclaimed

Or you asking about something else? If so, I don't understand what you want.

> 20180119132544.19569-2-aryabi...@virtuozzo.com doesn't contain this
> information and a quick glance over the follow up thread doesn't have
> anything as well. Ideally, this should be in the patch changelog, btw.

Well, I did these measurements only today and I don't have time machine.

Reply via email to