On 02/22/2018 06:44 PM, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Thu 22-02-18 18:38:11, Andrey Ryabinin wrote:
>>>> >>>> with the patch: >>>> best: 1.04 secs, 9.7G reclaimed >>>> worst: 2.2 secs, 16G reclaimed. >>>> >>>> without: >>>> best: 5.4 sec, 35G reclaimed >>>> worst: 22.2 sec, 136G reclaimed >>> >>> Could you also compare how much memory do we reclaim with/without the >>> patch? >>> >> >> I did and I wrote the results. Please look again. > > I must have forgotten. Care to point me to the message-id? The results are quoted right above, literally above. Raise your eyes up. message-id [email protected] I write it here again: with the patch: best: 9.7G reclaimed worst: 16G reclaimed without: best: 35G reclaimed worst: 136G reclaimed Or you asking about something else? If so, I don't understand what you want. > [email protected] doesn't contain this > information and a quick glance over the follow up thread doesn't have > anything as well. Ideally, this should be in the patch changelog, btw. > Well, I did these measurements only today and I don't have time machine.
