On 02/22/2018 01:59 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote: >> I think it's good practice to just expose only the *minimal* amount of >> data necessary. It's easier to audit and less likely to expose things >> accidentall. > But espfix64 is geniunely global. I'm confused.
I'm the confused one. In my *first* set of patches to do this, I missed making the espfix64 area global. This new code apparently got it right, but I assumed the "new" global area that showed up was a mistake, thus this patch. I'll change this patch into a commenting patch that calls out the need for keeping _PAGE_GLOBAL.
