On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 12:29:06PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 09:25:00AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra escreveu:
> > On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 10:35:58PM +0800, Jin Yao wrote:
> > > Unlike the perf report interactive annotate mode, the perf annotate
> > > doesn't display the LBR data.
> > > perf record -b ...
> > > perf annotate function
> > > It should show IPC/cycle, but it doesn't.
> > There is far more than IPC/cycle for the LBR data, so this Changelog is
> > misleading.
> > Also, I think that this patch goes the wrong way, we should reduce the
> > divergence of the various modes, not make it worse.
> Right, Peter, what would you think if I made --stdio use the same
> routines used to format the TUI, i.e. stdio would be equal to the TUI
> modulo de navigation/jump arrows, etc.
With the unification Jin Yao's patch would be the right thing anyways
-- it would magically work for stdio mode too. So it seems to me
merging the patch would be the right thing to do.