On Mon, 19 Feb 2018 13:47:36 +0100
Quentin Schulz <quentin.sch...@bootlin.com> wrote:
> !!'s behaviour isn't that obvious and sparse complained about it, so
> let's replace it with a ternary condition.
>
> Signed-off-by: Quentin Schulz <quentin.sch...@bootlin.com>
Applied to the togreg branch of iio.git and pushed out as testing
for the autobuilders to play with it.
Thanks,
Jonathan
> ---
> drivers/iio/adc/axp20x_adc.c | 8 +++++---
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/axp20x_adc.c b/drivers/iio/adc/axp20x_adc.c
> index a30a972..7a745cf 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/axp20x_adc.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/axp20x_adc.c
> @@ -365,7 +365,7 @@ static int axp20x_adc_offset_voltage(struct iio_dev
> *indio_dev, int channel,
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> - *val = !!(*val) * 700000;
> + *val = *val ? 700000 : 0;
>
> return IIO_VAL_INT;
> }
> @@ -442,15 +442,17 @@ static int axp20x_write_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> if (val != 0 && val != 700000)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> + val = val ? 1 : 0;
> +
> switch (chan->channel) {
> case AXP20X_GPIO0_V:
> reg = AXP20X_GPIO10_IN_RANGE_GPIO0;
> - regval = AXP20X_GPIO10_IN_RANGE_GPIO0_VAL(!!val);
> + regval = AXP20X_GPIO10_IN_RANGE_GPIO0_VAL(val);
> break;
>
> case AXP20X_GPIO1_V:
> reg = AXP20X_GPIO10_IN_RANGE_GPIO1;
> - regval = AXP20X_GPIO10_IN_RANGE_GPIO1_VAL(!!val);
> + regval = AXP20X_GPIO10_IN_RANGE_GPIO1_VAL(val);
> break;
>
> default:
