On Fri, 25 May 2007 14:15:40 +0200 Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -Andi (who hopes this thread will end soon now and we can all go > back to more important issues) fyi, the thread has been damn useful for me. If Ingo hadn't spotted that preempt_count() imbalance then there's a decent chance that I'd have been the first to hit it. Time to bisect 1,000 patches: maybe an hour, if I choose the x86 tree as the first pivot point, which is likely. Or I wouldn't have hit it, in which case a tester hits it, and someone (guess who) gets to enter into an intercontinental head-scratching session trying to work out who broke it this time, consuming the tester's time too. Plus we have a wrecked -mm and other people's code doesn't get as well-tested as it might. All for one silly little mistake. So. More care, please. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
