On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 10:33:09PM +0100, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> fw_cfg_read_blob() may fail, but does not return error. This may lead
> to undefined behaviours, such as a memcmp(sig, "QEMU") on uninitilized
> memory.

I don't think that's true - there's a memset there that
will initialize the memory. probe is likely the only
case where it returns a slightly incorrect data.

> Return an error if ACPI locking failed. Also, the following
> DMA read/write extension will add more error paths that should be
> handled appropriately.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lur...@redhat.com>
> ---
>  drivers/firmware/qemu_fw_cfg.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------
>  1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/qemu_fw_cfg.c b/drivers/firmware/qemu_fw_cfg.c
> index f6f90bef604c..5e6e5ac71dab 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/qemu_fw_cfg.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/qemu_fw_cfg.c
> @@ -59,8 +59,8 @@ static void fw_cfg_sel_endianness(u16 key)
>  }
>  
>  /* read chunk of given fw_cfg blob (caller responsible for sanity-check) */
> -static void fw_cfg_read_blob(u16 key,
> -                     void *buf, loff_t pos, size_t count)
> +static ssize_t fw_cfg_read_blob(u16 key,
> +                             void *buf, loff_t pos, size_t count)
>  {
>       u32 glk = -1U;
>       acpi_status status;
> @@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ static void fw_cfg_read_blob(u16 key,
>               /* Should never get here */
>               WARN(1, "fw_cfg_read_blob: Failed to lock ACPI!\n");
>               memset(buf, 0, count);
> -             return;
> +             return -EINVAL;
>       }
>  
>       mutex_lock(&fw_cfg_dev_lock);

Wouldn't something like -EBUSY be more appropriate?

> @@ -84,6 +84,7 @@ static void fw_cfg_read_blob(u16 key,
>       mutex_unlock(&fw_cfg_dev_lock);
>  
>       acpi_release_global_lock(glk);
> +     return count;
>  }
>  
>  /* clean up fw_cfg device i/o */
> @@ -165,8 +166,9 @@ static int fw_cfg_do_platform_probe(struct 
> platform_device *pdev)
>       }
>  
>       /* verify fw_cfg device signature */
> -     fw_cfg_read_blob(FW_CFG_SIGNATURE, sig, 0, FW_CFG_SIG_SIZE);
> -     if (memcmp(sig, "QEMU", FW_CFG_SIG_SIZE) != 0) {
> +     if (fw_cfg_read_blob(FW_CFG_SIGNATURE, sig,
> +                             0, FW_CFG_SIG_SIZE) < 0 ||
> +             memcmp(sig, "QEMU", FW_CFG_SIG_SIZE) != 0) {
>               fw_cfg_io_cleanup();
>               return -ENODEV;
>       }
> @@ -326,8 +328,7 @@ static ssize_t fw_cfg_sysfs_read_raw(struct file *filp, 
> struct kobject *kobj,
>       if (count > entry->size - pos)
>               count = entry->size - pos;
>  
> -     fw_cfg_read_blob(entry->select, buf, pos, count);
> -     return count;
> +     return fw_cfg_read_blob(entry->select, buf, pos, count);
>  }
>  
>  static struct bin_attribute fw_cfg_sysfs_attr_raw = {
> @@ -483,7 +484,11 @@ static int fw_cfg_register_dir_entries(void)
>       struct fw_cfg_file *dir;
>       size_t dir_size;
>  
> -     fw_cfg_read_blob(FW_CFG_FILE_DIR, &files_count, 0, sizeof(files_count));
> +     ret = fw_cfg_read_blob(FW_CFG_FILE_DIR, &files_count,
> +                     0, sizeof(files_count));
> +     if (ret < 0)
> +             return ret;
> +
>       count = be32_to_cpu(files_count);
>       dir_size = count * sizeof(struct fw_cfg_file);
>  
> @@ -491,7 +496,10 @@ static int fw_cfg_register_dir_entries(void)
>       if (!dir)
>               return -ENOMEM;
>  
> -     fw_cfg_read_blob(FW_CFG_FILE_DIR, dir, sizeof(files_count), dir_size);
> +     ret = fw_cfg_read_blob(FW_CFG_FILE_DIR, dir,
> +                     sizeof(files_count), dir_size);
> +     if (ret < 0)
> +             goto end;
>  
>       for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
>               ret = fw_cfg_register_file(&dir[i]);
> @@ -499,6 +507,7 @@ static int fw_cfg_register_dir_entries(void)
>                       break;
>       }
>  
> +end:
>       kfree(dir);
>       return ret;
>  }
> @@ -539,7 +548,10 @@ static int fw_cfg_sysfs_probe(struct platform_device 
> *pdev)
>               goto err_probe;
>  
>       /* get revision number, add matching top-level attribute */
> -     fw_cfg_read_blob(FW_CFG_ID, &rev, 0, sizeof(rev));
> +     err = fw_cfg_read_blob(FW_CFG_ID, &rev, 0, sizeof(rev));
> +     if (err < 0)
> +             goto err_probe;
> +
>       fw_cfg_rev = le32_to_cpu(rev);
>       err = sysfs_create_file(fw_cfg_top_ko, &fw_cfg_rev_attr.attr);
>       if (err)

I think that this is the only case where it's not doing the right thing right 
now in
that it shows 0 as the revision to the users.  Is it worth failing probe
here?  We could just skip the attribute, could we not?

> -- 
> 2.16.1.73.g5832b7e9f2

Reply via email to