On Wed, 2018-02-28 at 11:04 +0100, Petr Mladek wrote: > On Tue 2018-02-27 19:35:50, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Tue, 2018-02-27 at 16:50 +0100, Petr Mladek wrote: > > > On Fri 2018-02-16 23:07:10, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > > > > >
> > > This macro matches also values <= 16. > > > > Yes, I know. > > > > This had been discussed with Rasmus and we agreed that printing a > > result > > of kmalloc(0) is rather weird. > > I see > https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] > There you suggested to move this check into pointer(). But I do not > see any agreement on this. > Btw, I'm pretty sure that the checks like this or another one with PAGE_SIZE is cargo cult programming rather than imaging possible so weird use cases. -- Andy Shevchenko <[email protected]> Intel Finland Oy
