2018-01-16 17:06 GMT+01:00 Peter Rosin <p...@axentia.se>:
> The datasheet talks about the chip being an spd, but the chip is writable
> so atmel,24c02 is more appropriate as fallback.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Rosin <p...@axentia.se>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/eeprom/at24.txt | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/eeprom/at24.txt 
> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/eeprom/at24.txt
> index abfae1beca2b..edf9247613f6 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/eeprom/at24.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/eeprom/at24.txt
> @@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ Required properties:
>                  Some vendors use different model names for chips which are 
> just
>                  variants of the above. Known such exceptions are listed 
> below:
>
> +                "nxp,se97b" - the fallback is "atmel,24c02",
>                  "renesas,r1ex24002" - the fallback is "atmel,24c02"
>
>    - reg: The I2C address of the EEPROM.
> --
> 2.11.0
>

Applied to for-next, thanks.

Bart

Reply via email to