4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Yunlei He <heyun...@huawei.com>
commit dad48e73127ba10279ea33e6dbc8d3905c4d31c0 upstream.
Thread A: Thread B:
-f2fs_remount
-sbi->mount_opt.opt = 0;
<--- -f2fs_iget
-do_read_inode
-f2fs_init_extent_tree
-F2FS_I(inode)->extent_tree is NULL
-default_options && parse_options
-remount return
<--- -f2fs_map_blocks
-f2fs_lookup_extent_tree
-f2fs_bug_on(sbi,
!et);
The same problem with f2fs_new_inode.
Signed-off-by: Yunlei He <heyun...@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaeg...@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nbori...@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>
---
fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c | 10 +++++++++-
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c
@@ -172,7 +172,7 @@ void f2fs_drop_largest_extent(struct ino
__drop_largest_extent(inode, fofs, 1);
}
-void f2fs_init_extent_tree(struct inode *inode, struct f2fs_extent *i_ext)
+static void __f2fs_init_extent_tree(struct inode *inode, struct f2fs_extent
*i_ext)
{
struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi = F2FS_I_SB(inode);
struct extent_tree *et;
@@ -204,6 +204,14 @@ out:
write_unlock(&et->lock);
}
+void f2fs_init_extent_tree(struct inode *inode, struct f2fs_extent *i_ext)
+{
+ __f2fs_init_extent_tree(inode, i_ext);
+
+ if (!F2FS_I(inode)->extent_tree)
+ set_inode_flag(F2FS_I(inode), FI_NO_EXTENT);
+}
+
static bool f2fs_lookup_extent_tree(struct inode *inode, pgoff_t pgofs,
struct extent_info *ei)
{
