Hi Heiko,

On 01/03/18 16:50, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> Hi Jeffy, Thierry, Enric,
> 
> Am Mittwoch, 10. Januar 2018, 17:23:44 CET schrieb Thierry Escande:
>> From: Jeffy Chen <jeffy.c...@rock-chips.com>
>>
>> Add missing pm_runtime_disable() in bind()'s error handling path.
>>
>> Also cleanup encoder & connector in unbind().
> 
> Can you please split all these surprise "Also" sections into separate
> patches?
> 

I'll take a look.

> It looks like this is true for all following patch to some degree and
> the inno-hdmi patch even has a unbind reordering-change without
> mentioning it in the commit message.
> 

Actually, I think this patch is not correct against current mainline, see below.

> 
> Thanks
> Heiko
> 
>> Fixes: 80a9a059d4e4 ("drm/rockchip/dsi: add dw-mipi power domain support")
>> Signed-off-by: Jeffy Chen <jeffy.c...@rock-chips.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Thierry Escande <thierry.esca...@collabora.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/dw-mipi-dsi.c | 21 +++++++++++++--------
>>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/dw-mipi-dsi.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/dw-mipi-dsi.c index b1fe0639227e..78e6b7919bf7
>> 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/dw-mipi-dsi.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/dw-mipi-dsi.c
>> @@ -1282,7 +1282,7 @@ static int dw_mipi_dsi_bind(struct device *dev, struct
>> device *master, ret = dw_mipi_dsi_register(drm, dsi);
>>      if (ret) {
>>              DRM_DEV_ERROR(dev, "Failed to register mipi_dsi: %d\n", ret);
>> -            goto err_pllref;
>> +            goto err_disable_pllref;
>>      }
>>
>>      dsi->dsi_host.ops = &dw_mipi_dsi_host_ops;
>> @@ -1290,24 +1290,25 @@ static int dw_mipi_dsi_bind(struct device *dev,
>> struct device *master, ret = mipi_dsi_host_register(&dsi->dsi_host);
>>      if (ret) {
>>              DRM_DEV_ERROR(dev, "Failed to register MIPI host: %d\n", ret);
>> -            goto err_cleanup;
>> +            goto err_disable_pm_runtime;
>>      }
>>
>>      if (!dsi->panel) {
>>              ret = -EPROBE_DEFER;
>> -            goto err_mipi_dsi_host;
>> +            goto err_unreg_mipi_dsi_host;
>>      }
>>
>>      dev_set_drvdata(dev, dsi);
>>      pm_runtime_enable(dev);
>>      return 0;
>>
>> -err_mipi_dsi_host:
>> +err_unreg_mipi_dsi_host:
>>      mipi_dsi_host_unregister(&dsi->dsi_host);
>> -err_cleanup:
>> -    drm_encoder_cleanup(&dsi->encoder);
>> -    drm_connector_cleanup(&dsi->connector);
>> -err_pllref:
>> +err_disable_pm_runtime:
>> +    pm_runtime_disable(dev);

I think that this is not required, 'pm_runtime_enable' is called just before the
'return 0' (see above). Commit 517f56839f58 'drm/rockchip: dw-mipi-dsi: fix
possible un-balanced runtime PM enable' moved the call to that place. So, now
the call to pm_runtime_disable is not needed.

>> +    dsi->connector.funcs->destroy(&dsi->connector);
>> +    dsi->encoder.funcs->destroy(&dsi->encoder);

Here, there is a reordering and also a function replacement. The reorder makes
sense to me, first cleanup the connector and then the encoder, but I'm not sure
about the function change and if is needed, anyway, in the case is needed,
shouldn't be

+       drm_connector_cleanup(&dsi->connector);
+       drm_encoder_cleanup(&dsi->encoder);

instead?

>> +err_disable_pllref:
>>      clk_disable_unprepare(dsi->pllref_clk);
>>      return ret;
>>  }
>> @@ -1319,6 +1320,10 @@ static void dw_mipi_dsi_unbind(struct device *dev,
>> struct device *master,
>>
>>      mipi_dsi_host_unregister(&dsi->dsi_host);
>>      pm_runtime_disable(dev);
>> +
>> +    dsi->connector.funcs->destroy(&dsi->connector);
>> +    dsi->encoder.funcs->destroy(&dsi->encoder);
>> +

Same here.

>>      clk_disable_unprepare(dsi->pllref_clk);
>>  }
> 
> 

Best regards,
  Enric

Reply via email to