On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 09:37:09AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 3:06 AM, Richard Kuo <r...@codeaurora.org> wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 11:43:10PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >> - How do I build an llvm based toolchain for Hexagon? Do I need patches
> >> on top of the llvm-6 release branch? Where can I find the corresponding
> >> binutils-2.30 sources?
> > Just to follow up on this, the closest thing right now to compile the kernel
> > for Hexagon is the toolchain included with the Hexagon SDK. However, the
> > linker will fail because of something in the kernel build process that
> > I think produces empty sections, which that linker can't handle. A newer
> > linker can handle it, but that's not scheduled to be released until much
> > later
> > this year.
> > That's actually the closest option currently. I tried the upstream source
> > but it seems to lack some specific patches to support kernel compilation,
> > so I will need to chase those down.
> Thanks for trying it out. Can you point me to the sources? I tried downloading
> a Hexagon SDK when I first looked at it, but only got a huge chunk of binary
> java files and gave up before finding the llvm patches.
I don't think the SDK patches are available externally.
The good news is I think we're now one patch away from the upstream LLVM
compiling a functional kernel for Hexagon (a few fixes to LLVM/clang have
been committed already). It technically compiles but produces an abort (from
a null deref) which the linker doesn't like.
The linker itself unfortunately is going to be a different matter.
Employee of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project