On 5/28/07, Daniel Hazelton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Monday 28 May 2007 05:08:54 Nitin Gupta wrote: > On 5/28/07, Daniel Hazelton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Monday 28 May 2007 04:37:04 Nitin Gupta wrote: > > > On 5/28/07, Daniel Hazelton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:New testbed based on minilzo complete. Results from run using 1000 runs to generate averages: 1000 run averages: 'Tiny LZO': Combined: 55.196 usec Compression: 37.132 usec Decompression: 18.064 usec 'miniLZO': Combined: 55.785 usec Compression: 40.862 usec Decompression: 14.923 usec
Great! I believe its now ready for mainline. We can do further cleanups and optimizations there - more users of this code will surely drive more enhancements.
(using (tiny/full)/100 for percentages: 'Tiny' is 0.9% faster on average
I think this is more appropriate: [(full-tiny)/full]*100 => tiny is ~1% faster on average.
Same for the Compression 'safe' decompressor from tiny is 1.2% slower than unsafe from minilzo)
This is expected :) Cheers, Nitin - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
