Bummer. :-(

On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 10:05 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki <r...@rjwysocki.net> wrote:

> +       if (drv->states[idx].flags & CPUIDLE_FLAG_POLLING) {
> +               *nohz_ret = false;
> +       } else if (drv->states[idx].target_residency < TICK_USEC) {
> +               /*
> +                * Do not stop the tick if there is at least one more state
> +                * within the tick period range that could be used if longer
> +                * idle duration was predicted.
> +                */
> +               *nohz_ret = first_idx > idx &&
> +                           drv->states[first_idx].target_residency < 
> TICK_USEC;

This is reversed, sent a wrong version of the patch.

I'll resend with this fixed shortly.

Reply via email to