On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 1:47 PM, Rob Herring <r...@kernel.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 06:19:32PM -0600, richard.g...@linux.intel.com wrote:
>> From: Alan Tull <at...@kernel.org>
>>
>> Add a Device Tree binding for the Intel Stratix10 SoC FPGA manager.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alan Tull <at...@kernel.org>
>> ---
>> v2: this patch is added in patch set version 2
>> ---
>>  .../devicetree/bindings/fpga/intel-stratix10-soc-fpga-mgr.txt  | 10 
>> ++++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
>>  create mode 100644 
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/fpga/intel-stratix10-soc-fpga-mgr.txt
>>
>> diff --git 
>> a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/fpga/intel-stratix10-soc-fpga-mgr.txt 
>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/fpga/intel-stratix10-soc-fpga-mgr.txt
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..78de689
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/fpga/intel-stratix10-soc-fpga-mgr.txt
>> @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
>> +Intel Stratix10 SoC FPGA Manager
>> +
>> +Required properties:
>> +- compatible : should contain "intel,stratix10-soc-fpga-mgr"
>> +
>> +Example:
>> +
>> +     fpga_mgr: fpga-mgr@0 {
>> +             compatible = "intel,stratix10-soc-fpga-mgr";
>
> No reg or anything else? Is that because it all goes thru the service
> layer firmware?

Yes.

There will be a few more clients of the service layer: QSPI, Crypto
and warm reset.

> Just get the service layer driver to instantiate a
> device for this driver or get rid of the 2 layers if that's all the
> firmware interface does. DT is not a Linux driver instantiation
> mechanism.

Right, this should be describing hardware.

I could add this to the service layer binding:

firmware {
        svc {
                compatible = "intel,stratix10-svc";
                method = "smc";
                memory-region = <&service_reserved>;
                fpga-mgr {
                        compatible = "intel,stratix10-soc-fpga-mgr";
                };
        };
};

>
> And build your dts files with "W=1" because there's an error in this
> example.

Ouch.  Yes.

Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node /soc/fpga-mgr@0 has a unit name,
but no reg property

Thanks for the review,
Alan

>
> Rob

Reply via email to