From: Abel Vesa <abelv...@linux.com>

[ Upstream commit 6f05d0761af612e04572ba4d65b4c0274a88444f ]

The support for dynamic ftrace with CONFIG_DEBUG_RODATA involves
overriding the weak arch_ftrace_update_code() with a variant which makes
the kernel text writable around the patching.

This override was however added under the CONFIG_OLD_MCOUNT ifdef, and
CONFIG_OLD_MCOUNT is only enabled if frame pointers are enabled.

This leads to non-functional dynamic ftrace (ftrace triggers a
WARN_ON()) when CONFIG_DEBUG_RODATA is enabled and CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER
is not.

Move the override out of that ifdef and into the CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE
ifdef where it belongs.

Fixes: 80d6b0c2eed2a ("ARM: mm: allow text and rodata sections to be read-only")
Suggested-by: Nicolai Stange <nicsta...@gmail.com>
Suggested-by: Rabin Vincent <ra...@rab.in>
Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa <abelv...@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Rabin Vincent <ra...@rab.in>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+ker...@armlinux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.le...@microsoft.com>
---
 arch/arm/kernel/ftrace.c | 11 ++++++-----
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/ftrace.c b/arch/arm/kernel/ftrace.c
index 709ee1d6d4df..faa9a905826e 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/ftrace.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/ftrace.c
@@ -29,11 +29,6 @@
 #endif
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE
-#ifdef CONFIG_OLD_MCOUNT
-#define OLD_MCOUNT_ADDR        ((unsigned long) mcount)
-#define OLD_FTRACE_ADDR ((unsigned long) ftrace_caller_old)
-
-#define        OLD_NOP         0xe1a00000      /* mov r0, r0 */
 
 static int __ftrace_modify_code(void *data)
 {
@@ -51,6 +46,12 @@ void arch_ftrace_update_code(int command)
        stop_machine(__ftrace_modify_code, &command, NULL);
 }
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_OLD_MCOUNT
+#define OLD_MCOUNT_ADDR        ((unsigned long) mcount)
+#define OLD_FTRACE_ADDR ((unsigned long) ftrace_caller_old)
+
+#define        OLD_NOP         0xe1a00000      /* mov r0, r0 */
+
 static unsigned long ftrace_nop_replace(struct dyn_ftrace *rec)
 {
        return rec->arch.old_mcount ? OLD_NOP : NOP;
-- 
2.14.1

Reply via email to