On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 04:06:13PM -0600, Jeremy Linton wrote:

[...]

> diff --git a/include/linux/cacheinfo.h b/include/linux/cacheinfo.h
> index 0c6f658054d2..1446d3f053a2 100644
> --- a/include/linux/cacheinfo.h
> +++ b/include/linux/cacheinfo.h
> @@ -97,6 +97,15 @@ int func(unsigned int cpu)                                 
> \
>  struct cpu_cacheinfo *get_cpu_cacheinfo(unsigned int cpu);
>  int init_cache_level(unsigned int cpu);
>  int populate_cache_leaves(unsigned int cpu);
> +int cache_setup_acpi(unsigned int cpu);
> +int acpi_find_last_cache_level(unsigned int cpu);
> +#ifndef CONFIG_ACPI
> +int acpi_find_last_cache_level(unsigned int cpu)

This has got to be a static inline function declaration (see kbot report).

Lorenzo

> +{
> +     /* ACPI kernels should be built with PPTT support */
> +     return 0;
> +}
> +#endif
>  
>  const struct attribute_group *cache_get_priv_group(struct cacheinfo 
> *this_leaf);
>  
> -- 
> 2.13.6
> 

Reply via email to