On Mon, 2018-03-12 at 01:11 +0530, Arushi Singhal wrote:
> Using pr_<loglevel>() is more concise than
> printk(KERN_<LOGLEVEL>).
> Replace printks having a log level with the appropriate
> pr_*() macros.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Arushi Singhal <arushisinghal19971...@gmail.com>
> ---
> changes in v2
> *in v1 printk() were replaced with netdev_*()

>  net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_acct.c      | 2 +-
>  net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_ecache.c    | 2 +-
>  net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_timestamp.c | 2 +-
>  net/netfilter/nf_nat_core.c            | 2 +-
>  net/netfilter/nfnetlink_queue.c        | 4 ++--
>  5 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

None of these files have a #define for pr_fmt so this
should be OK.

Perhaps coalesce the formats and remove the unnecessary periods too.

> diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_acct.c 
> b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_acct.c
[]
> @@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ static int nf_conntrack_acct_init_sysctl(struct net *net)
>       net->ct.acct_sysctl_header = register_net_sysctl(net, "net/netfilter",
>                                                        table);
>       if (!net->ct.acct_sysctl_header) {
> -             printk(KERN_ERR "nf_conntrack_acct: can't register to 
> sysctl.\n");
> +             pr_err("nf_conntrack_acct: can't register to sysctl.\n");
>               goto out_register;
>       }
>       return 0;

etc...

> diff --git a/net/netfilter/nfnetlink_queue.c b/net/netfilter/nfnetlink_queue.c
[]
> @@ -834,8 +834,8 @@ nfqnl_mangle(void *data, int data_len, struct 
> nf_queue_entry *e, int diff)
>                       nskb = skb_copy_expand(e->skb, skb_headroom(e->skb),
>                                              diff, GFP_ATOMIC);
>                       if (!nskb) {
> -                             printk(KERN_WARNING "nf_queue: OOM "
> -                                   "in mangle, dropping packet\n");
> +                             pr_warn("nf_queue: OOM "
> +                                     "in mangle, dropping packet\n");
>                               return -ENOMEM;
>                       }
>                       kfree_skb(e->skb);

Reply via email to