3.16.56-rc1 review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <garsi...@embeddedor.com>

commit 24dbc6000f4b9b0ef5a9daecb161f1907733765a upstream.

Currently, x86_cache_size is of type int, which makes no sense as we
will never have a valid cache size equal or less than 0. So instead of
initializing this variable to -1, it can perfectly be initialized to 0
and use it as an unsigned variable instead.

Suggested-by: Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <garsi...@embeddedor.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <b...@alien8.de>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torva...@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org>
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1464429
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180213192208.ga26...@embeddedor.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mi...@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <b...@decadent.org.uk>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h      | 2 +-
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c          | 2 +-
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c | 2 +-
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c            | 4 ++--
 4 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h
@@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ struct cpuinfo_x86 {
        char                    x86_vendor_id[16];
        char                    x86_model_id[64];
        /* in KB - valid for CPUS which support this call: */
-       int                     x86_cache_size;
+       unsigned int            x86_cache_size;
        int                     x86_cache_alignment;    /* In bytes */
        int                     x86_power;
        unsigned long           loops_per_jiffy;
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
@@ -905,7 +905,7 @@ static void identify_cpu(struct cpuinfo_
        int i;
 
        c->loops_per_jiffy = loops_per_jiffy;
-       c->x86_cache_size = -1;
+       c->x86_cache_size = 0;
        c->x86_vendor = X86_VENDOR_UNKNOWN;
        c->x86_model = c->x86_mask = 0; /* So far unknown... */
        c->x86_vendor_id[0] = '\0'; /* Unset */
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
@@ -352,7 +352,7 @@ static struct microcode_ops microcode_in
 
 static int __init calc_llc_size_per_core(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
 {
-       u64 llc_size = c->x86_cache_size * 1024;
+       u64 llc_size = c->x86_cache_size * 1024ULL;
 
        do_div(llc_size, c->x86_max_cores);
 
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c
@@ -86,8 +86,8 @@ static int show_cpuinfo(struct seq_file
        }
 
        /* Cache size */
-       if (c->x86_cache_size >= 0)
-               seq_printf(m, "cache size\t: %d KB\n", c->x86_cache_size);
+       if (c->x86_cache_size)
+               seq_printf(m, "cache size\t: %u KB\n", c->x86_cache_size);
 
        show_cpuinfo_core(m, c, cpu);
        show_cpuinfo_misc(m, c);

Reply via email to